From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,64fe8f87aae99538 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: george.priv@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to return an empty aggregate Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <0742cf95-b2a9-438a-98ac-318f1f1c311e@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> References: <945217e8-ec37-4a33-9847-28e8e7d55798@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <2c23eecd-d5bf-4320-b0cd-a45b584ddfe3@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.196.71.114 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1207434997 24281 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2008 22:36:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 22:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=151.196.71.114; posting-account=VnNb3AoAAACTpRtCcTrcjmPX7cs92k1Q User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SPARKS X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20843 Date: 2008-04-05T15:36:36-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 5, 5:14 pm, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > On 5 Kwi, 18:04, george.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Can you provide non-academic example? > > For the empty record? > I thought I did already. :-) > This might be a challenge, because we have no judge that can say > whether something is academic or not. > > Consider a logging system that is designed with OO in mind. There is a > base interface with some operation(s) for logging and a bunch of > concrete implementations for various log destinations - one for disk > file, one for network output, one for database persistency, etc. The > part of the program that does something useful takes Log'Class and > feeds its log entries via given Log'Class parameter to whatever > happens to be a concrete Log implementation - a classic strategy > pattern. > > What would you do to... switch the logging off? > > I would create the derived (concrete) log that is *empty* and does > nothing and pass it as Log'Class to wherever it is expected. > It cannot be simpler than that. So you derive concrete from not-empty type? > > Is it academic? I would do it at the nearest opportunity. > > -- > Maciej Sobczak *www.msobczak.com*www.inspirel.com