From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:fa85:: with SMTP id v127-v6mr3686089ith.11.1527378935353; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:55:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:51d1:: with SMTP id d17-v6mr708776oth.12.1527378935164; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.68.MISMATCH!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v8-v6no3710848itc.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni3413itd.0!nntp.google.com!v8-v6no3710846itc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 16:55:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9b76440e-ab22-4fcf-8a54-f85a9d4d010a@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.247.198.106; posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.247.198.106 References: <2d717805-f6a4-4de9-bf4a-d45037034f96@googlegroups.com> <9b76440e-ab22-4fcf-8a54-f85a9d4d010a@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <067fdb8b-e69c-4ec7-b7ae-50a11dc97d83@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: why "unconstrained subtype in component declaration" while said component given default value ? From: Jere Injection-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 23:55:35 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 2045 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3637815366 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52710 Date: 2018-05-26T16:55:34-07:00 List-Id: On Saturday, May 26, 2018 at 6:11:13 PM UTC-4, Mehdi Saada wrote: > But isn't the situation the same in automatic variables, with arrays whose constraint is only known at run time ? Like this: > procedure Main is > subtype Pos_Little is Positive range 1..56; > package Num_Gen is new Ada.Numerics.Discrete_Random (Pos_Little); > Gen : Num_Gen.Generator; > begin > declare > Arr : array (1..Num_Gen.Random(Gen)) of Positive; > begin > null; > end; > end Main; > Yet this case is legal. Record types need to support Representation Clauses, where as normal variables do not.