From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.150.164 with SMTP id uj4mr6804281pab.19.1374551176841;
        Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.110.103 with SMTP id hz7mr1550472igb.17.1374551176518;
 Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news.ripco.com!rahul.net!wasp.rahul.net!rahul.net!news.kjsl.com!usenet.stanford.edu!qx7no50194761pbc.1!news-out.google.com!b2ni84830pby.1!nntp.google.com!cb17no48562qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3ebb953d-070c-46a6-99d1-611c5a79f72f@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=69.20.190.126;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.20.190.126
References: <c87917bb-ecd1-4c2d-a5e9-3290ab2ca958@googlegroups.com>
 <op.w0myx7wgule2fv@cardamome>
 <7cbb4b66-9b59-4d82-a626-2fdc845ccbde@googlegroups.com>
 <3ebb953d-070c-46a6-99d1-611c5a79f72f@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <05fb05ec-771b-4f80-9e60-b7b92be7c501@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL is proving...educational
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 03:46:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16491
Date: 2013-07-22T20:46:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, July 22, 2013 5:34:09 PM UTC-6, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> 
> I don't recommend using LRM 3.10.2 for that purpose since it will lead to nightmares.  :) :)

I prefer of thinking of it as the crushing of all the hopes and dreams of amateur compiler-writers who might be interested in doing an Ada. ;)