From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,268e52cd81f7181c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!n13g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT bug - still in 2010? Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <052699dd-95f4-4c05-98d2-a77ccb53c585@n13g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> References: <6cebf1a3-3b2a-4e79-a39e-669a6a5ca00c@l20g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <4cc89500$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <2806244b-5b67-4d67-811f-05e797760b6d@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.182.236 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1288254693 2255 127.0.0.1 (28 Oct 2010 08:31:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n13g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.182.236; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14881 Date: 2010-10-28T01:31:33-07:00 List-Id: On 27 Pa=C5=BA, 23:56, Simon Wright wrote: > > I also work on Mac and I have the same compiler version. > > Looks like there are different "same" compiler versions... > > This is a bit worrying. I suspect you may be using one of the compilers > that I built for Snow Leopard? No, this one I got from the Libre site, from AdaCore. I don't even have SL, so for sure it is not yours. :-) I agree that it's a mess and certainly it does not help to make Ada any more popular. The other (older) compiler that I have comes from macada.org, but it also crashes. Interestingly, the only reason I use two different compilers is that the newer one does not integrate with C++ (we have discussed it on this group already). But now I've hit a wall that is too high for all existing compilers. Not good. -- Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com