From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,314d661a32522d8a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: baldrick Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <04e55b5c-37b7-4dab-84e9-b548cb597a68@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <87iqzco4n7.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> <7e6246de-2ac0-4311-8047-ae88ea4ccb38@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <76f13aae-d11f-4ffa-b4d1-ad3d597598d8@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <651j49F2eaafuU1@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.175.50.15 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206631366 15670 127.0.0.1 (27 Mar 2008 15:22:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.175.50.15; posting-account=H52IZQoAAAAXM-RV35eCd20PYXCi5WQf User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b4) Gecko/2008031317 Firefox/3.0b4,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20606 Date: 2008-03-27T08:22:46-07:00 List-Id: > I thought that -gnatN was even more aggressive than -gnatn. My understanding is that -gnatN was essentially a workaround for various historical limitations of the gcc inliner, most of which no longer exist. I've been told by ACT that -gnatN is deprecated on the x86. Personally I never bother with it.