From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ffda156586947522,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!i18g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: REH <spamjunk@stny.rr.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: volatile vs volatile_components
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:00:01 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <046f172d-90f7-4a23-a181-dd1461ebd94b@i18g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.91.173.36
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1225897202 16399 127.0.0.1 (5 Nov 2008 15:00:02
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 15:00:02 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i18g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.91.173.36;
	posting-account=GwkXCgoAAABFSG45Q--uHVZG6zn6ec-e
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3)
	Gecko/2008092417 Firefox/3.0.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2576
Date: 2008-11-05T07:00:01-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Is there a difference between defining an array with pragma volatile
vs volatile_components? The standard says that if the object is
volatile, its components are volatile. So, if the object is defined as
having volatile components, what does that say--if anything--about the
object as a whole?