From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.224.86.200 with SMTP id t8mr27033443qal.0.1373329632320; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:27:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.67.113 with SMTP id m17mr1817966igt.10.1373329632274; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder02.blueworldhosting.com!news.ripco.com!news.glorb.com!t19no840314qam.0!news-out.google.com!f7ni1652qai.0!nntp.google.com!t19no840304qam.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 17:27:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=108.90.156.221; posting-account=qZVz2QoAAAAN9WxYp-9jYb7jORc4Zqwt NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.90.156.221 References: <8a3093bb-90b3-4081-9b0b-dfde5aa6b851@googlegroups.com> <993despcuk1d.1ifczvyo501px.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <04244d3e-2a29-4980-b7a1-0dad4569caa2@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Point a beginner in the right direction? Cheap bare-board to run with a RTOS for running ADA From: mjsilva@scriptoriumdesigns.com Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:27:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16181 Date: 2013-07-08T17:27:11-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, July 8, 2013 12:43:24 AM UTC-7, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: =20 > I only said that *modern* hardware is not so simple to access as in the >=20 > times when it was one or two memory-mapped hardware registers at fixed >=20 > addresses. Even a "small" SBC is far more complex than any old mainframe >=20 > was. Why do you keep talking about SBCs? We're talking about microcontrollers, = in particular 32-bit devices that run at 10s to 100s of MHz and have tens o= f kilobytes to a few megabytes of program memory, and less than that of RAM= . Far from being an SBC, such boards may be as simple as the processor, a = crystal and the necessary bypass caps. Everything else is header pins. And these micros continue to have those memory-mapped hardware registers, a= nd those of us who program these chips deal with those registers all the ti= me.