From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f37364fd74b84042
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Child Package Operator Visibility
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <02a14c57-05d3-4276-9626-113a7518f2c4@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <L-udnRBPxNSpGWranZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com>
	<C41D48F5.E2FDD%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <6b08d1d0-1896-4951-8528-e11bef196dd7@1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.225.224.254
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1207581954 8100 127.0.0.1 (7 Apr 2008 15:25:54
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 15:25:54 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.225.224.254;
	posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
 .NET
	CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; InfoPath.1;
 .NET CLR
	3.0.04506.648),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20867
Date: 2008-04-07T08:25:50-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 7, 8:03=A0am, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 7:19 am, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
> In fact, this sort of thing is an idiom I used to use a lot, before
> Ada 95 gave us "use type". =A0I would declare a package with the types I
> wanted to declare, and then define a nested package Operators which
> redefined all the operator symbols on those types using renaming, so
> that another package could say "use Pkg.Operators" without having to
> "use Pkg" which would make too much visible.
>
I like your design. It is a very creative idea. This can even be
applied for non-primitive operators.

AV