From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a41c4a2c795dbe34 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!t14g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Shark8 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Will "renames" increase program size? Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <027f3b98-41dc-4f58-bb36-51b3c54bc750@t14g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> References: <46294109-f07d-49c0-8e81-65a369a05ced@z15g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <1ayjsy885qg2b$.13bmeo97hbau1$.dlg@40tude.net> <316ac8ed-1ded-43d0-98d1-36bb2c0221ad@f2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <2e8222df-9b82-497f-9dc4-5cb0d5653550@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <1t5j5p8gurul3$.k4cq2qnsbbjb.dlg@40tude.net> <12lr1j2mmzidu.18gjo4p3e73kk$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.230.151.194 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1308704283 27358 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2011 00:58:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:58:03 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t14g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.230.151.194; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19999 Date: 2011-06-21T17:56:16-07:00 List-Id: On Jun 18, 5:44=A0pm, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > > In any case, it doesn't matter; I'm leaving soon for the upcoming meeting= s, > and I have to get ready to go, so this discussion is going to stop here. = And > it's obvious that I'm completely wasting my time with you -- you're smart > and clever enough to be a valuable resource vis-a-vis design and correcti= on > of the language -- but if you won't even try to use the terminology > correctly, you're never going to provide any value because I'll never be > able to tell if you are talking about a real problem or one that exists o= nly > in your head. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 Randy. Or the third option: a real problem that you cannot understand because the words being used to convey the idea are incompatible with the words that you are using to reconstruct the idea (i.e. someone using the word 'window' to describe their 'monitor').