From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,39ade949adb6bf4
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Felix Krause <fordprefect86@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: StdCall and pragma Import_Function
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <02033047-713a-4e98-9f1b-26b7f9d24d60@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <332032a4-0acf-459d-a743-e90e823ca5af@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
 <118ybwhr53151$.fjqabmpo2k23$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <090a4db0-d67c-4dfe-9d67-24b2edc3b392@r40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@googlegroups.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 92.203.29.36
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1313775506 6370 127.0.0.1 (19 Aug 2011 17:38:26
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:38:26 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: 
 <090a4db0-d67c-4dfe-9d67-24b2edc3b392@r40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=92.203.29.36;
 posting-account=sXebhAoAAACnuNgFPhYnsVyKMeBm3XmF
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20684
Date: 2011-08-19T10:38:26-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, August 19, 2011 7:26:01 PM UTC+2, Adam Beneschan wrote:

>  Out of
> curiosity, Felix, what happens if you add a 62-bit "filler" field to
> Bit_Vector, with 2..63 in the representation clause?  Does that make
> things work?

No, it still gives a size of 4 bytes. Btw, I do get a warning that 56 bits are unused without the filler, so GNAT seems to get the size of the record right.