From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d8bc00b1190f5f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "bob" <bklungle@junque.com>
Subject: Re: GETARG in Ada?
Date: 1999/02/27
Message-ID: <01be62a4$bb870820$0e2915c0@w95>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 449421910
References: <7b9r2g$lha$1@netra.msu.montana.edu>
Organization: B & D Associates
X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Feb 27  4:58:30 PM CST 1999
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-02-27T16:58:30-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

--
-- If I were doing this, I would get rid of ALL "use" clauses except for
-- "use type". But this is just my personal preference. Since you knew the
-- numerics were integers, you could have used the "'image" clause and not
-- had to use "integer_io" at all.
-- Here is a quick set of possible mods.
-- I suspect you will get many variations on this, one for everyone who
-- responds.
-- I think the important thing is you are expanding your knowledge.
--
-- cheers...bob
--
with TEXT_IO;           use TEXT_IO;
with ADA.COMMAND_LINE;  -- use ADA.COMMAND_LINE;  
with ADA.STRINGS;       use ADA.STRINGS;
with ADA.STRINGS.FIXED; use ADA.STRINGS.FIXED;

procedure TEST_GETARG is

--    package INT_IO is new INTEGER_IO(INTEGER);
--    use INT_IO;

    ARG_COUNT: INTEGER;

    MAX_ARG_LENGTH: constant INTEGER := 80;

    ARG: STRING(1..MAX_ARG_LENGTH) := (others => ' ');

begin

    ARG_COUNT := ADA.COMMAND_LINE.ARGUMENT_COUNT;
    put_line("number of command-line args =" & integer'image(arg_count));
--    PUT("number of command-line args = ");
--    PUT(ARG_COUNT, 0);
--    NEW_LINE;

--    if ARG_COUNT > 0 then 
    
        for CURRENT_ARG in 1..ARG_COUNT loop
            PUT("arg" & integer'image(current_arg) & " = ");
--            PUT(CURRENT_ARG);
--            PUT("=");
            ARG(1..ADA.COMMAND_lINE.ARGUMENT(CURRENT_ARG)'LENGTH) := 
                ADA.COMMAND_lINE.ARGUMENT(CURRENT_ARG);
            PUT(TRIM(ARG,RIGHT));
            NEW_LINE;
        end loop;
    
--    end if;

end TEST_GETARG;
--
--  linux:~/atest> ada getarg.adb
--  gcc -c -g getarg.adb
--  getarg.adb:6:11: warning: file name does not match unit name, should be
"test_getarg.adb"
--  gnatbind -x getarg.ali
--  gnatlink -g getarg.ali
--  linux:~/atest> getarg abc def
--  number of command-line args = 2
--  arg 1 = abc
--  arg 2 = def
-- ***************************************************************
Lou Glassy <glassy@acheta.nervana.montana.edu> wrote in article
<7b9r2g$lha$1@netra.msu.montana.edu>...
> Question:  Can anyone help me clean up this program?
>            No, this is not a homework assignment.
>            I'm an old Fortran programmer, learning Ada... 
> 
> Here is a little Fortran program (compiles, runs with g77 under Linux)
> that prints out the arguments on the Unix command line:
> 
>         PROGRAM TEST_GETARG
>         IMPLICIT NONE
> 
>         INTEGER ARG_COUNT, I
>         CHARACTER(LEN=20) CURRENT_ARG
> 
>         ARG_COUNT = IARGC()
>         PRINT *, 'number of args = ', ARG_COUNT
>         DO I = 1, ARG_COUNT
>                 CALL GETARG(I, CURRENT_ARG)
>                 PRINT *, 'ARG ', I, '=', CURRENT_ARG
>         END DO 
> 
>         END
> 
> I'd like to do the same thing in Ada-95.  For concreteness, I'm 
> using GNAT (3.10p), but I'm guessing any A95 implementation on a 
> Unix box would eat something similar to the following:
> 
> with TEXT_IO;           use TEXT_IO;
> with ADA.COMMAND_LINE;  use ADA.COMMAND_LINE;  
> with ADA.STRINGS;       use ADA.STRINGS;
> with ADA.STRINGS.FIXED; use ADA.STRINGS.FIXED;
> 
> procedure TEST_GETARG is
> 
>     package INT_IO is new INTEGER_IO(INTEGER);
>     use INT_IO;
> 
>     ARG_COUNT: INTEGER;
> 
>     MAX_ARG_LENGTH: constant INTEGER := 80;
> 
>     ARG: STRING(1..MAX_ARG_LENGTH) := (others => ' ');
> 
> begin
> 
>     ARG_COUNT := ADA.COMMAND_LINE.ARGUMENT_COUNT;
>     PUT("number of command-line args = ");
>     PUT(ARG_COUNT);
>     NEW_LINE;
> 
>     if ARG_COUNT > 0 then 
>     
>         for CURRENT_ARG in 1..ARG_COUNT loop
>             PUT("arg ");
>             PUT(CURRENT_ARG);
>             PUT("=");
>             ARG(1..ADA.COMMAND_lINE.ARGUMENT(CURRENT_ARG)'LENGTH) := 
>                 ADA.COMMAND_lINE.ARGUMENT(CURRENT_ARG);
>             PUT(TRIM(ARG,RIGHT));
>             NEW_LINE;
>         end loop;
>     
>     end if;
> 
> end TEST_GETARG;
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> My A95 "TEST_GETARG" program works, I'm just trying to figure
> out how to write it more cleanly.
> 
> I much appreciate Ehud Lamm's "Ada Idiom Page" and other postings 
> kind souls have made to comp.lang.ada.  My question is, how would
> an experienced Ada programmer write my little TEST_GETARG program 
> in Ada-95?  Is there an easier way to handle strings than this?
> 
> Thanks in advance...
> 
> -lou
> 
> Lou Glassy (glassy@cs.montana.edu)
>