From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,365c587e3030d8f6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Jerry van Dijk" <jvandyk@ibm.net>
Subject: Re: Win32Ada
Date: 1998/11/14
Message-ID: <01be0ff2$30b31ea0$96a55c8b@aptiva>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 411825510
References: <72as14$bh4$1@platane.wanadoo.fr>
 <01be0e3b$a980c340$5da65c8b@aptiva> <72ev6o$gn$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <364BE12F.F38A285C@cts.com> <72inaf$8it$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
X-Notice: should be reported to postmaster@ibm.net
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@ibm.net
X-Trace: 14 Nov 1998 17:12:51 GMT, 139.92.165.150
Organization: JerryWare
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com schreef in artikel <72inaf$8it$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
> available. Apparently, in what I consider to be a serious
> mistake, the government did not make the same requirement
> for the Win32 bindings. It would of course have been
> possible to generate clean room bindings free of Microsoft
> control.

Is there any reason why such a binding could not be produced again,
using the latest API ?

-- 
-- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland
-- Team Ada       | email: jdijk@acm.org
-- Ada & Win32: http://stad.dsl.nl/~jvandyk