From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,30352abc52760363 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Nick Roberts" Subject: Re: Delphi & Ada; Ada to C++ Date: 1998/02/19 Message-ID: <01bd3d7c$2406b3e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 326720243 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <34E47622.15EB@atc-1s.hac.com> <6c9tjc$obg@universe.digex.net> <34eb5d36.20077308@news.tiac.net> <01bd3cc5$a74ff160$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <6chg3h$4qf@universe.digex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: UUNet UK server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet UK) Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Sorry! I got the impression that was how GNAT worked (translate Ada to C, and then compile to executable). Looking at the documentation for GNAT 3.10 (R1.30), I see no mention of intermediate C. Is this how GNAT worked once upon a time, or did I simply get totally the wrong end of the stick? What is GNAT's relationship to GCC? == Nick Roberts ================================================ == Croydon, UK =========================== == ================ == Proprietor, ThoughtWing Software ========== == Independent Software Development Consultant ====== == Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com ==== == Voicemail & Fax +44 181-405 1124 === == == == I live not in myself, but I become == === Portion of that around me; and to me == ==== High mountains are a feeling, but the hum == ======= Of human cities torture. =========== -- Byron [Childe Harold] David Weller wrote in article <6chg3h$4qf@universe.digex.net>... > In article <01bd3cc5$a74ff160$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>, > Nick Roberts wrote: > >Machine translation is certainly possible. Since GNAT produces C code (and > >C++ is pretty well a superset of C), this suggests a possibility (doubtless > > > NO NO NO NO!!! > > Repeat after me: GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce > C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. > GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT > does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT > produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce > C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. GNAT does NOT produce C code. > > There. Feel better now? :-) > > -- > What is DIVX? Find out at http://www.riva.com/dvd_divx.html > Tired of "junk" e-mail? Write to your congressman and tell them you support > H.R. 1748, "The Netizens Protection Act of 1997". Make those SPAM-roaches run! http://www.cauce.org TAKE BACK THE INTERNET! >