From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c54bb73b6fd8d22 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Jerry van Dijk" Subject: Re: GDB Woes Continued... Date: 1998/02/04 Message-ID: <01bd31b4$3dac0580$6d2c5c8b@aptiva>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 322109547 References: <6b07b3$inj$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <01bd2e9b$76253380$562c5c8b@aptiva> <6b4k6k$30t$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <8767mwtpg2.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com> Organization: Ordina Finance Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-02-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar schreef in artikel ... > We haven't been able to duplicate these problems so far, and > we have run GDB on a variety of Win95 machines. One observation is > that we are running the latest version of Win95 on pretty much all > machines, not the broken version you can buy in stores, so perhaps > that is one variable. This is the real cause of the current misery: without a reproduction scenario there is no way to find/fix the problem. BTW I've tried both a real 'vintage 95' Win95, and the new OSR2 that came with my new laptop last month. Gdb fails identically on both systems. Yet at the same time Martin tells us he does not see this problem in his class. Perhaps the answer is to wait for Win98... :-) -- -- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland -- Team Ada | email: jdijk@acm.org