From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8963682ce4cab241
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT Limitations?
Date: 1998/01/26
Message-ID: <01bd2a9f$1faf7100$34fe82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 319455573
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <6aesm3$sr6$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU> <885721317.973387@wagasa.cts.com>
 <6afuas$vrn$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Organization: UUNet UK server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet UK)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Please, by all means, post the example.  We (well alright then, I ;-) would
be very interested!

-- 

Nick Roberts
Croydon, UK

Proprietor, ThoughtWing Software; Independent Software Development
Consultant
* Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com * Voicemail & Fax +44 181-405 1124 *
*** Always game for a verbal joust (usually as the turkey) ***


wanker@exploited.barmy.army wrote in article
<6afuas$vrn$1@Masala.CC.UH.EDU>...
> >It sounds like the "C/C++ to Ada" guide is either wrong or unclear.  In
a
> >subprogram call (which has similar syntax), you can omit some parameters
> >if they have default values.  You can't do the same for record
aggregates.
> >(Being able to omit components with default initial values would be a
> >nice feature, by the way.)
> 
> It's wrong then because in the section on records it specifically
> states that you could do this.  I could post the precise example
> of what it claims if anyone is interested, but it's probably
> pointless - thanks.