From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9bf8bfc34e223b4d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT controlled types
Date: 1998/01/26
Message-ID: <01bd2a9d$2ec16420$34fe82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 319450274
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <c1.01.2K7NRr$00o@zesi.ruhr.de> <EnCrzw.EHw@world.std.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Organization: UUNet UK server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet UK)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


But why does the declaration have to be at the library level?  Is this a
rule of Ada, or something specific to GNAT?

-- 

Nick Roberts
Croydon, UK

Proprietor, ThoughtWing Software; Independent Software Development
Consultant
* Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com * Voicemail & Fax +44 181-405 1124 *
*** Always game for a verbal joust (usually as the turkey) ***


Robert A Duff <robertduff@world.std.com> wrote in article
<EnCrzw.EHw@world.std.com>...
> In article <c1.01.2K7NRr$00o@zesi.ruhr.de>,
> Haug Buerger <haug@zesi.ruhrREMOVEIT.de> wrote:
> >...What is
> >meant with library level?
> 
> Basically, it means not nested inside any subprograms.
> 
> In your example, you must move the instantiation of t out to such a
> place -- you could make the instantiation a library unit, or you could
> put it inside a library package.