From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8985766beca53c7c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio
Date: 1998/01/16
Message-ID: <01bd22ba$53fd1bc0$5cfd82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 316626482
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <69mc65$t5g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Organization: UUNet UK server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet UK)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-01-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I'm all noise, I guess... ;-)

-- 

Nick Roberts
Croydon, UK

Proprietor, ThoughtWing Software; Independent Software Development
Consultant
* Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com * Voicemail & Fax +44 181-405 1124 *
*** Eats three shredded spams every morning for breakfast ***


Pat Rogers <progers@acm.org> wrote in article
<69mc65$t5g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>...
> If you've ever complained about the signal/noise ration on c.l.a, how
about
> looking at my posted question with subject reading "statically compatible
> access discriminants in derivation"?    It is pure signal... :)
> 
> 
> pat rogers
> progers@acm.org