From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Veli-Pekka Nousiainen" <vp.nousiainen@remove_this_eiffel.fi>
Subject: Re: Building blocks (Was: Design By Contract)
Date: 1997/09/09
Message-ID: <01bcbd1d$54dcf7c0$108142c1@Yeif-1.eiffel.fi>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 270979836
References: <JSA.97Sep2182406@alexandria.organon.com>
 <JSA.97Sep3201329@alexandria.organon.com>
 <5ulurp$aj8$1@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> <5un58u$9ih$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl>
 <5v0bph$n98$2@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
 <Pine.SGI.3.95.970908193446.11288B-100000@shellx.best.com>
Organization: AMT Oy
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-09-09T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Unsafe? what is unsafe in Eiffel inheritance? And what is the fix? 
I have joined in much too late... 
VP 

Brian Rogoff <bpr@shellx.best.com> wrote in article
<Pine.SGI.3.95.970908193446.11288B-100000@shellx.best.com>...
<SNIP> 
> Eiffel's inheritance is based on a theoretical model which later turned
out 
> to be unsafe. A (theoretical) fix was proposed, and never implemented.
And
> now we have another theoretical fix. So much for Eiffel theoretical
> models! :-)
> 
> -- Brian
>