From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2507b6d982782e45
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Michael Quinn" <nospam@eat.me>
Subject: Re: [Q] Problem with Array Concatenation?
Date: 1997/07/08
Message-ID: <01bc8bd5$11942e30$7774d8cc@fatman>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255566570
References: <33c280c8.418253@news.demon.co.uk>
Organization: Caitisys
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Concatenation of arrays is valid in Ada 83.  Your code should work.


-- 
Michael T. Quinn
sent replies to :  mtquinn@hom.net  

John McCabe <john@assen.demon.co.uk> wrote in article
<33c280c8.418253@news.demon.co.uk>...
> Hi,
> 
> I would appreciate confirmation on whether the following piece of code
> is legal Ada 83, and what the effect should be (obviously I haven't
> bothered with Text_IO for outputting results, but what should happen
> when I compile this?).
> 
> -----------
> procedure Test is
.. stuff deleted