From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Richard Turner" <foo@foo.com>
Subject: Re: Software Engineering is not a hoax...
Date: 1997/06/17
Message-ID: <01bc7b0a$df5636f0$0ca3ca0a@cookies>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 249032124
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: iiscgate.iisc.co.uk [194.159.8.1]
References: <JSA.97May14201336@alexandria>
 <yvsaflrrfka.fsf@albatross.cl.cam.ac.uk> 			<JSA.97May19211413@alexandria>
 <yvsd8qm4isl.fsf@merganser.cl.cam.ac.uk> 			<5lsjb3$bqc@bcrkh13.bnr.ca>
 <EACHUS.97May22113850@spectre.mitre.org> <33859489.7FB8@spam.innocon.com>
 <3385B67B.1439@msim.co.uk.spamstop> <dewar.864448217@merv>
 <01bc7746$c7475c50$fc00af88@godiva> <33A63C56.5CB7@seanet.com>
Organization: Aculab
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


brucemo wrote ...
> Keith Shillington wrote:
> 
> > There's something wonderful about tinkering, like writing HTML in VI;
like
> > counting the number of clock cycles in a loop to see if some blindingly
> > fast operation can be made faster; not because it needs to be, but
because
> > it can be.
> 
> This latter case is not just bad software engineering, it is bad hacking
:-)

"Bad"? What's bad about it? If it's bad, what moral principle does it
offend?