From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1bef33dd6d805c1a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Nick Roberts" <Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: stuff
Date: 1997/05/18
Message-ID: <01bc63ae$7ef6e3e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 242998835
References: <md5:AEB770CC4F41F9C14E5056EEB8BA8D66> <337C8911.6BD@aisf.com>
 <EAAyG8.A4x@world.std.com>
Organization: UUNet PIPEX server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet PIPEX)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-05-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>




You all seem to be missing the fact here that the compiled code returns
R26, having computed (loaded) 9 into R0. So, in fact, the function does
indeed return a junk value (unknown context notwithstanding), just as you
would expect it to. Of course, if it did always return 9, this would also
be acceptable behaviour (according to the RM).

Nick.