From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,334540b5fc3dada1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Nick Roberts" Subject: Re: urgent help needed!!! Date: 1997/03/31 Message-ID: <01bc3e26$3e8f7680$46f582c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 229753632 References: <859690935.9677@dejanews.com> <01bc3dcf$fc3222c0$85fe82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <01bc3dd0$ff5bf600$7e0464c3@edi-c> Organization: UUNet PIPEX server (post doesn't reflect views of UUNet PIPEX) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Kurt Svensson wrote in article <01bc3dd0$ff5bf600$7e0464c3@edi-c>... > Nick Roberts wrote: > > Remember: Ada programmers are the BEST programmers! > > Can You please explain that? Just showing my prejudice, Kurt! I really do believe that Ada is a superior language (in general) to others, which shall remain nameless, whose designs are a dog's breakfast by comparison. (No offence intended to dogs :-) Thus, Ada is the best, and so are the programmers who use it! No? Perhaps I'm just getting old. Nick [:-)