From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c462e8ad74872a98
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Stan and/or Jill Grimes" <Grimes@nwci.net>
Subject: Re: Question on modular types
Date: 1997/01/08
Message-ID: <01bbfd1e$fdb58ac0$270e63cf@nwci.nwci.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 208414724
references: <01bbfa96$66d516a0$8d2d5c8b@jerryware>
organization: Net Access Corp, Denville, NJ
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-08T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


First in your revealing, you did not mention what the output of the put
statements 
gave you, I suspect it was 2^32... If not, try reducing the range and see
if you get an constraint error then. Many bugs are quite creatures, perhaps
the -1 was interpreted first as 32 ones then as an unsigned integer.Because
I do not have the output this is just guessing. (no time to try, just time
to chat).
   Carryon, we will see you in the trenches... or where ever..StanGz

Jerry van Dijk <jvandyk@ibm.net> wrote in article
<01bbfa96$66d516a0$8d2d5c8b@jerryware>...