From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 11cae8,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid11cae8,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: "Chris" Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1996/12/14 Message-ID: <01bbe510$e0593240$LocalHost@gaijin>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 204084695 references: <32A4659D.347A@shef.ac.uk> <32A47B95.393F@iconcomp.com> <32A59FE9.2667@shef.ac.uk> <32A5F390.2A99@iconcomp.com> <32A7B9BC.52C71CEF@probe.net> organization: Chris & Co newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lnag.java,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1996-12-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jeff Miller a �crit dans l'article <32A7B9BC.52C71CEF@probe.net>... > Effective reuse is substantially a management issue, not a technical > one. OO helps, but organizational and process changes are more > important. I agree, but OO (design and implementation) will force a minimum of reuse even if for best reusability, we have to think about it. -- Chris, drunk philosoph and bad programmer "The nail pulling up calls the hammer" zen proverb