From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, RATWARE_MS_HASH,RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d3432b5ee2e7ebcf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Subject: Re: ****************** Ada vs C++ Help ******************** Date: 1996/08/31 Message-ID: <01bb9737$5964e300$378371a5@dhoossr.iquest.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 177630767 distribution: world references: <3226aa7e.7480949@news.redstone.army.mil> <50764p$t2u@krusty.irvine.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 organization: DBH Enterprises, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hi, I believe the document to which Adam referred is this one (which does exist): http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/docs/flyers/text/9x-cplus.txt Hope this helps -- David C. Hoos, Sr., http://www.dbhwww.com http://www.ada95.com Adam Beneschan wrote in article <50764p$t2u@krusty.irvine.com>... > Sarner-BA-MD@PATRIOT-ccmail.SED.Redstone.Army.Mil writes: > > > >Hello, > > > >Does anyone know of some good papers comparing Ada 95 to C++. > > One paper I liked: "C++??, A Critique of C++", 2nd edition, by Ian Joyner: > ftp://ftp.brown.edu/pub/c++/C++-Critique-2ed.PS > > The same web page where I found this also links to "CONTRASTS: Ada 9X > and C++", by Edmund Schonberg: > > ftp://ajpo.sei.cmu.edu/public/ada9x/reports/misc/9x-cplus.txt > > Unfortunately, this path no longer exists, and I can't find the > report. Does anyone know where it migrated to? In the process of > looking for this file, I did run across another report at > ftp://ajpo.sei.cmu.edu/public/AdaIC/docs/adacplus.txt, which might be > useful. > > Hope this helps, > -- Adam >