From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10db24,fec75f150a0d78f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db24,public From: Bradd W. Szonye Subject: RE: ANSI C and POSIX (was Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada) Date: 1996/04/19 Message-ID: <01bb2dcc.f2fa7860$c6c2b7c7@Zany.localhost>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 150397446 references: <4k9qhe$65r@solutions.solon.com> <828964950snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <4kbfup$2vd@news1.mnsinc.com> <4kbl5i$p3@mordred.gatech.edu> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Fri Apr 19 3:46:10 AM CDT 1996 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.edu Date: 1996-04-19T03:46:10-05:00 List-Id: On Monday, April 08, 1996, Robert Dewar wrote... > [...] In practice compiler vendors > often go to quite a bit of trouble to make sure that things that people > expect to work, do in fact work they way they expect, even if the standard > says that the behavior is undefined. In the desktop computing world, where the IBM's and Microsofts send the standards instead of the ANSI's and ISO's, this concept is known as a "de facto standard." Translation from the Latin: it works 'cuz everybody does it that way, not 'cuz ISO-9899/1990 sez so.