From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,39e272d357c68416
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jim_snead <basswoodNObaSPAM@my-deja.com.invalid>
Subject: Re: Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java?
Date: 1999/12/01
Message-ID: <01a2e3cb.4316300b@usw-ex0101-005.remarq.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 555610926
References: <11f733ec.57d88b68@usw-ex0107-042.remarq.com>
 <384127A5.61431A14@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>
 <0a0133f8.3baf10c0@usw-ex0101-001.remarq.com>
X-Originating-Host: 207.58.21.98
X-Complaints-To: wrenabuse@remarq.com
X-Trace: WReNphoon3 944104704 10.0.2.5 (Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:18:24 PST)
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 19:18:24 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Wren-Trace: eKGErK2087ny47S6t/avp7eSvL3poeS9peOtraX16rH56bT44bPl4fT4
Date: 1999-12-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <0a0133f8.3baf10c0@usw-ex0101-001.remarq.com>, jim_snead 
wrote:
> Apex subsystems add no value
> in guaranteeing integration success. Ada 95 got it
> right, and the old guard tool vendors are trying
> to create FUD in how to correctly integrate large
> software projects.

I did not mean to imply that all of the old guard vendors
are not moving forward.  Just that the new vendors
such as GNAT,  Aonix, and Averstar seem to be creative
in coming up with interesting ideas and solutions.

For example, new integration approaches will be
required for software geared to  Ada JVM development.



* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!