From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b30240b5a381bbf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-24 14:31:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!enews.sgi.com!newspeer2.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Excessive quoting and Outlook (was: Ada 95 for an ARM-based bare board?) Date: 24 Aug 2002 16:30:43 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <01IPMvKD$LYX@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <5ee5b646.0208241200.274bde80@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1030223627 31503 192.135.80.34 (24 Aug 2002 21:13:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 21:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28373 Date: 2002-08-24T16:30:43-06:00 List-Id: In article <5ee5b646.0208241200.274bde80@posting.google.com>, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > Now to be fair, Microsoft has *finally* recognized that > security is worth worrying about (you may remember the > highly publicized period earlier this year when development at MS was > stopped so everyone could worry about security). Certainly they have recognized that it is bringing them adverse publicity. > So perhaps things may improve in the future You may feel that I am unfair, but I am highly skeptical that they will make significant progress.