From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e4d318dc27be1451,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "C. Berg (602) 436-5290" <BERGC@ELLX.DECNET.AZ.HONEYWELL.COM>
Subject: Pragma pack
Date: 1997/03/10
Message-ID: <01IGC5R855Z6001KU2@EMAIL.AZ.HONEYWELL.COM>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 224552378
Sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU>
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
X-VMS-To: EMAIL::IN%"INFO-ADA@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU"
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I have some questions for the list Ada gods regarding the use of
pragma pack (this is from Ada '83 land).

If you have a record similar to the following:

 type blah is record
   field_1 : field_1_type;
   field_2 : field_2_type;
   <etc...>
 end record;

What is the difference (to an individual record like this) between
employing a pragma pack on this record alone, without packing its
component fields, and not using a pack at all?  For example, will
a variable declared to be of this record type be the exact same size
with only the "highest" level pack as with no packs at all?

Also, while I would assume that a 'Size attribute will dynamically
reflect the effect of pragma pack on a type, can anybody confirm to me
that this is actually true, and does the same go for the USE clause?

I realize that implementations of pragmas are more or less up the
compiler writers, so any input, rules of thumb, references, etc,
are welcome....

Thanks in advance,

- Cory
(any expressed opinions are mine alone, disclaimer, disclaimer....)