From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,792f67d7cdb6d8e6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Matthew Heaney <F22HEANEY@MASS.DNET.HAC.COM>
Subject: Protected Types: Broadcase Example
Date: 1995/03/30
Message-ID: <01HORE9H4Z8200TKIK@EDEN1.HAC.COM>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 100649468
sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@VM1.NODAK.EDU>
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
x-vms-to: ADA_NEWS
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1995-03-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On page II-25 of the Ada 95 rationale is a description of an implementation
of a broadcast signal using a protected object.

On page II-26 the author says that "the very astute reader might care to
note that we can actually program this example in Ada 95 without using a
requeue at all."

Can those of you out there more astute than I send me the code fragment
on how to implement the broadcast example without use of a requeue?
Why isn't a requeue necessary?

J'apprend, mais tres lentement.

Matthew Heaney
f22heaney@mass.dnet.hac.com