From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b2282a8c33fa92a0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Simon Johnston Subject: Re: Java vs Ada 95 (Was Re: Once again,Ada absent from DoD SBIR Date: 1996/10/21 Message-ID: <01BBBF62.464EF320@idc213.rb.icl.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 191196801 sender: Ada programming language comments: To: Dale Stanbrough content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Dale Stanbrough wrote: > " To which I would add "hierarchical package system", though I'm sure = someone > out there must feel that this is also bad! This would approximate my = short > list of Ada advantages over Java. Besides GC, which is arguable, no = one has > listed any *language* advantages of Java over Ada." >=20 > I think Interfaces are a _very_ nice feature. Yep, good feature and in fact it would be nice to have in Ada 95, though = it would say that a more important point is the lack of generics in = Java. =20 >=20 > Dale >=20 >=20 with StandardDisclaimer; use StandardDisclaimer; package Sig is --,----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---. --|Simon K. Johnston - Development Engineer (C++/Ada95) |ICL Retail = Systems | --|-----------------------------------------------------|3/4 Willoughby = Road| --|Internet : skj@acm.org |Bracknell = | --|Telephone: +44 (0)1344 476320 Fax: +44 (0)1344 476302|Berkshire = | --|Internal : 7261 6320 OP Mail: S.K.Johnston@BRA0801 |RG12 8TJ = | --|WWW URL : http://www.acm.org/~skj/ |United Kingdom = | --`----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---' end Sig;