From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,edb9cd4fb1b29f31 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!v16g2000vbq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Mark Lorenzen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: No_Implicit_Heap_Allocations Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:38:30 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <0127a740-2d83-4690-bd96-50601a8b1feb@v16g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> References: <0b92849a-7719-45f5-a6bb-568be824a414@k17g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <72385e60-87d6-46a3-8051-73761fee9039@k12g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <185be3a1-ac6a-4def-bfca-a45916c0865a@u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <286299f7-ee02-4555-8d30-ce3c2a8d70b4@s3g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <8abb789c-cdbd-4cdf-9b3c-f7f9e3106bdf@f2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1296229110 2919 127.0.0.1 (28 Jan 2011 15:38:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v16g2000vbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.163.1.105; posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; da; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17744 Date: 2011-01-28T07:38:30-08:00 List-Id: On 28 Jan., 16:19, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > On Jan 28, 6:15=A0am, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) > > wrote: > > This file is commonly named =93gnat.adc=94, while this can be named any= other =A0 > > way. You may find more about this Configuration Pragmas File here : =A0= http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn_unw/The-Configuration-Pragmas-... > > Thank you for explanations. Indeed, a separate file dedicated for > configuration pragmas can be very handy. Indeed. On the project I'm working on at the moment, we plan to place all Restriction pragmas in a common file to ensure that all units are compiled with the same set of restrictions. Maybe it isn't strictly necessary, but better safe than sorry. - Mark L