From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c4429dc5b1f1886
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!g1g2000pre.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Leaking Into Day Job
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <00bf1adf-0a87-42d4-ae72-f80dd125279a@g1g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
References: <Xns9D40887322788WarrensBlatherings@188.40.43.245>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1269035616 31262 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2010 21:53:36
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:53:36 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g1g2000pre.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
	posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
	SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR
	3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:10647
Date: 2010-03-19T14:53:36-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 19, 10:24=A0am, Warren <ve3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Heh, heh... today I got several COBOL compile
> errors, telling me that Ada is leaking into my
> day job:
>
> =A0 =A0 ...
> =A0 =A0 END EVALUATE
>
> (Should be END-EVALUATE)
>
> =A0 =A0 IF RET-CODE /=3D 0 THEN
>
> (you get the idea). I never had this problem with
> C/C++ :)

I wonder how many programmers have had Ada leak into their C/C++ and
have written something like

   if (code /=3D 0) { ... }

This is valid C, so the compiler won't complain, but it will not quite
do what you want.

:)
                       -- Adam