From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed5557cae26e63ac
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-24 01:01:30 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!GTEWD.MTV.GTEGSC.COM!papayd
Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Message-ID: <00987EBE.A6708E20.8@gtewd.mtv.gtegsc.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 1994 00:56:16 PST
Sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@NDSUVM1.BITNET>
From: Dave Papay M/S 7G32 x2791 <papayd@GTEWD.MTV.GTEGSC.COM>
Subject: Beaujolais Effect -- what is it?
Date: 1994-11-24T00:56:16-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Tucker Taft <stt@DSD.CAMB.INMET.COM> writes:

>We have eliminated all remnants of the Beaujolais Effect, but we did debate
>various instances of the "Ripple" effect during the language revision
>process (apologies to Gallo Ripple Wine enthusiasts ;-).

Do these "Ripple" effects occur when you attempt to "Port" an Ada 83 program
to Ada 9X?  Perhaps someone could "gin" up a summary of the various
instances ;-)

You know, this thread is becoming more and more like the one concerning the
phonetic spelling of "fish."

                             |         |
David Papay                  |    o    |
papay@acm.org  (preferred)   |  ^/---  | <insert your favorite disclaimer here>
dpapay@aol.com (alternate)   |  />     |
                             |         |
                             | fleche! |