From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:44ad:: with SMTP id n13mr4116980qvt.127.1584439909279;
        Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:491:: with SMTP id
 z17mr2814923oid.78.1584439908947;
 Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <r4p8md$otc$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=192.107.155.10;
 posting-account=XfA3zgkAAABoz6fRf3Tehtnqqr7Ycml-
NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.107.155.10
References: <6bcc6133-8c8b-4252-a8e6-fd64a5eec2ca@googlegroups.com>
 <r4p8md$otc$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <008fa756-2952-4c25-9058-9bba29da2ba0@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Good/best way to enforce library-level instantiation a generic
 package
From: Vincent Marciante <vincent.marciante@l3harris.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:11:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58204
Date: 2020-03-17T03:11:48-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, March 16, 2020 at 9:21:18 PM UTC-4, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> "Vincent Marciante" wrote in message 
> news:6bcc6133-8c8b-4252-a8e6-fd64a5eec2ca@googlegroups.com...
> >I made a generic package that I want only to be instantiated at library 
> >level.
> > I'm working on compile-time a way to enforce that desire which involves 
> > access
> > type accessibility level checking but have not yet set it up correctly.
> > Is there a better/standard way?
<snip>
> You can of course use any library-level access type in your program for this 
> purpose; I picked this one 'cause it is already sitting around.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
>                    Randy.
Thanks for the suggestion. It was along that lines of what I was doing
and it hepled.