From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e3fa322e453b2f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-28 13:38:14 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!enst!enst.fr!not-for-mail From: "David Botton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: www.adahome.com?... Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 16:44:32 -0500 Organization: ENST, France Sender: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org Message-ID: <007d01c07117$5d514e90$0202a8c0@dbdell2000> References: <3a491263_3@news3.prserv.net> <92d6cb$g57$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <92fens$7je$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a4b456f_3@news3.prserv.net> <92fmis$dn1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <92fop9$fn8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <005501c07108$050589e0$0202a8c0@dbdell2000> <92gabc$v3l$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Reply-To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.enst.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: avanie.enst.fr 978039493 80870 137.194.161.2 (28 Dec 2000 21:38:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 21:38:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Return-Path: X-pair-Authenticated: 216.78.248.54 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: comp.lang.ada mail<->news gateway Errors-To: comp.lang.ada-admin@ada.eu.org X-BeenThere: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3439 Date: 2000-12-28T16:44:32-05:00 > Well, again this was a post Magnus made slightly over two years ago, not > one I made today. Even back then, I think the claim was demonstrably false. Sorry, I must have glanced over it quickly and though it was your post. I recall the post well. I had not received any responses to e-mails before or immediately after that post. I had also offered to assist. I am certainly not bashing him or the efforts he initialy put in. I am though very upset that he has allowed his site (one that is still being mentioned in articles and other media) to become a detriment to the community he once looked to benefit. The least he could do is turn over the keys to those of us willing to fix his site up, or give up the domain name so some one else can rebuild a site in its place. > I think this should be a valuable lesson to us all on the evils of > restrctively licensing generally-useful information. Well at least he is a billboard for the FSF of what can happen if... :-) David Botton