From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a28d031ddb8d985f
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: First successful build gnat/gcc-4.4.1 on MinGW without
	modification needed
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 07:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <007c7c36-22dc-4749-85a4-b88cbe8f465b@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <db074b90-3209-45d7-9798-684cd918a811@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<61838bb7-e501-4f60-b235-598a29d3f1d8@o15g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.232.233.169
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1249048891 28512 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2009 14:01:31
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.232.233.169;
	posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1)
	Gecko/20090715 Firefox/3.5.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7488
Date: 2009-07-31T07:01:31-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jul 31, 5:43=A0am, Vadim Godunko <vgodu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 30, 8:08=A0pm, Anh Vo <anhvofrc...@gmail.com> wrote:> For the firs=
t time GNAT / GCC-4.4.1 is built successfully without any
> > modification needed. In addition, the installation went smoothly, too.
> > I have been testing it since. It has performed great so far. In some
> > cases it performs far more better than previous version. I will have
> > another update when the testing is complete.
>
> Which exception propagation model does it use?

How many exception propagation model is there? In addition, how does
one find it out?