From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9dc2c03e552da989
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.196.232 with SMTP id ip8mr20500198pbc.6.1340147099254;
        Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni70270pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: ggsub@pragmada.co.cc
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why Ada isn't as successful as it should be
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <002c20b6-1ded-4fb4-8d92-6546f5892fe2@googlegroups.com>
References: <de7b6a71-0447-4e3f-9000-da6691511796@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.20.201.198
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1340147099 27957 127.0.0.1 (19 Jun 2012 23:04:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:04:59 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <de7b6a71-0447-4e3f-9000-da6691511796@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=184.20.201.198;
 posting-account=uInPWgoAAAD9VvUJDc0jNwDhBg_137JZ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-06-19T16:04:57-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, June 18, 2012 11:12:20 AM UTC-7, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> Maybe it isn't about the syntax, the verbosity, or the lack of text-handling support:

I guess someone needs to grow a beard and invent a "new" language (that will just happen to be identical to Ada in all but name).