From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ca86b71a49161489,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: KMays@msn.com (Kenneth Mays)
Subject: The Ada experience
Date: 1996/07/23
Message-ID: <00001a73+00002fc2@msn.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169879906
organization: The Microsoft Network (msn.com)
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I still stand with both Ada and C++, it is more what the programmer 
can do with the knowledge they have of both languages. Some may use 
the theory that if a carpenter is told build a house, the carpenter 
would pick the right tools for the job. C++ has its strengths and 
weakness, and I would say the same for Ada 95. I ask myself only if 
the carpenter is capable of getting the job done and done RIGHT 
(maybe the first time?). If the carpenter couldn't make a wise 
decision on what tools to use for teh job, maybe that carpenter 
better look for another profession and get some CERTIFIED training. 
:o)

Ken