From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b88c7b1a4db3246c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:40:55 -0600 From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <87sldpo83w.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4dCdncquF5TP71_YnZ2dnUVZ_tOmnZ2d@megapath.net> <87odo9lhog.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <1170681175.011450.167450@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada Reference Manual in texinfo format? Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 18:42:17 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Message-ID: <0-adnRXpj9QKU1rYnZ2dnUVZ_t2tnZ2d@megapath.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38 X-Trace: sv3-IfwZQdZR21uC0jGL6lrFFDY4CRpoNyoyDS6Ina9dJrYQS03Dp07vk7EgwEZgl13o5r+1I1PAVBl2gyX!kH8JgeuSKM/avCpz5hmFQ7ONsM4N4tBv5nlSfbFjasBDkz7uLwRj/jwkk8/vwnMt5qQeP/utOv93!m8/JNUgsbOu5Cg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8989 Date: 2007-02-05T18:42:17-06:00 List-Id: "Ludovic Brenta" wrote in message news:1170681175.011450.167450@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... ... > It would be better if Randy granted you write access to the CVS > repository. Randy, what do you think? That probably wouldn't be a good idea, for a number of reasons. The obvious one is that the current Perl scripts only support read access (adding something else would be, umm, interesting). But the main one is that the primary purpose of that repository is managing the ACATS. I need to keep very tight control over that (can't have tests appearing there or getting modified without tracking them and announcing the changes with careful version control). That's true for the RM source, too, don't want any surprise modifications to it, either. Randy.