From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,429176cb92b1b825
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!216.196.110.144.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:16:38 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: Robert Matthews <ignore@ramatthews.free-online.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:17:07 +0000
User-Agent: KNode/4.4.6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Subject: Re: AWS Coding Styles (and about boring plain-linear text files in
 the end)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <op.vpfsjkfdule2fv@garhos>
 <3077fffa-eed7-4763-8bca-9ac3bb0a41e1@o14g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <82y66ihc0i.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <4d355532$0$6878$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <8b58b9da-a014-4a0e-8d20-ca86a4993961@h17g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vpix8wlkule2fv@garhos> <ih63aj$tvj$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <opclukh52cb7$.20ypr8aj468$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <ih6pia$3m1$1@news.eternal-september.org> <op.vpkr4pufule2fv@garhos>
Followup-To: comp.lang.ada
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0-OdndPHNIoLRqTQnZ2dnUVZ7vudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: 
 sv3-U4ko/8BW3LxAARgtV7z8p7CX0Ze9OajmbU60pqoqOf/EQtw9qVWHlqDj/aTcMWB8uK4W5onk8707cot!1L8/ZQZpQMBqgr3gjihDsZjssYHBj6xE3/RMn2KlNP6lQNtk2mWfaVD3iggXynyAyNcoU43scyEo!PycjeBqnYjEvZiyBwKOflD1t
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1925
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17584
Date: 2011-01-21T19:17:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote:

> 
> That's precisely why source-review is better made by some-one else than by
> your-self. Fortunately, if you really need to do it your self (if you are
> single in a project), you still have an option: wait for some time, some
> weeks or preferably some months (without coming back to that source), to
> review your self (you will read it with different eyes).

I find a next-day review very effective.

Bob Matthews