From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-18 20:20:04 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.gbronline.com!news.gbronline.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:20:01 -0500
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 22:20:46 -0500
From: Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com>
Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com
Organization: Ain't no organization here!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
 rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, es-mx, pt-br, fr-ca
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X "left hand side" repeater.
References: <slrnbebc2b.ht.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bebbba07.0306101640.19178e81@posting.google.com>
 <3EE7CC70.E1FD3A67@adaworks.com>
 <bebbba07.0306121116.33e4741@posting.google.com>
 <bcbu9i$hgu5j$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de> <AwvGa.1228118$F1.143267@sccrnsc04>
 <3EECA772.4B662024@adaworks.com> <hYmHa.6881$Hb.124073@news4.e.nsc.no>
 <BB13C10D.350A%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <bcl1pu$jscm4$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
 <BB13CDB9.3516%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <bcl4o8$kkj68$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
 <eIydnQ7dD_77h3OjXTWJiA@gbronline.com> <bclnfn$1ga0$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <BB14B31A.35B6%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <BB14D345.35C8%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <slrnbeu6cp.clr.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <BB14D999.35D3%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <slrnbeu7ft.d0u.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <e_GdnRh0ovFS1XKjXTWJkg@gbronline.com>
 <slrnbf06a2.qo.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
In-Reply-To: <slrnbf06a2.qo.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <-dycnQfc3Pl_tmyjXTWJjw@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.117.18.100
X-Trace: 
 sv3-NXMBujoTLQKnHeTAPazTJp8cLsKAZxHSBFG8eJnrmdCGhvHNtYlYiZyPoPNBnEO8COQ8CpMcSvT4cLu!UOH96tvjfbmx+FKLXmXTo8QGt//pXWf6t9oYHCBAWwbeYKRR1vs55nNmDhE/tTwF+GXAGj3cMYcb!obLq/g==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@gbronline.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39425
Date: 2003-06-18T22:20:46-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>>    Pixel is Screen.Buffer(i) in Pixel := Pixel + 1;
>>
>>would be semantically better.
> 
> OK. I was thinking more like: 
> 
>    Wesley Groleau is Hamlet in Shakespear's Hamlet.
> 
>    and not
> 
>    Hamlet is Wesley Groleau in Shakespear's Hamlet.

Hmmm.  It does make sense that way.  Perhaps the ambiguity
is an argument against it.  :-)