From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d2df3e9ad18fa63 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-21 15:22:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nnxp1.twtelecom.net!216.170.153.135.MISMATCH!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ISO/IEC 14519 - Ada POSIX binding Date: 21 Jun 2003 17:22:12 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <+8nZt0n349+Q@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <3EF2F6B8.3030706@noplace.com> <3EF338C5.2010005@cogeco.ca> <87r85nqlwa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1056234026 1717 192.135.80.34 (21 Jun 2003 22:20:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 22:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39543 Date: 2003-06-21T17:22:12-05:00 List-Id: In article , David Emery writes: > The error reporting model is for the POSIX call to raise > POSIX.POSIX_Error. (Unlike in C...) The application program must > handle this exception somehow, or be terminated. (In the latter > case, the value of the POSIX process's return code is 42, "Unhandled > Exception." What is a "POSIX process" ? Should not error handling be restricted to the Ada task that encountered the error ?