From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!usc-isif.arpa!DLEHMAN
From: DLEHMAN@USC-ISIF.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: OTHER ACVCs
Message-ID: <[USC-ISIF.ARPA].9-Apr-86.14:17:34.DLEHMAN>
Date: Wed, 9-Apr-86 17:17:00 EST
Article-I.D.: <[USC-ISIF.ARPA].9-Apr-86.14:17:34.DLEHMAN>
Posted: Wed Apr  9 17:17:00 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 11-Apr-86 20:29:34 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>



   While there exists only one ACVC--with different versions--,
I recall that TeleSoft issued a challenge to the Ada market almost
a year ago to "create tests that will contribute to assuring the
viability of Ada as a production tool."  Wanted were "smallish Ada
programs chosen to maximize the discovery of bugs in Ada compilers"
to compose a complementary test suite.  Does anyone know more
about the results of the TelSoft challenge?

---Dan LEHMAN