From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,447bd1cf7a88c198 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-11 16:48:02 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!hub.org!hub.org!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news2.rdc2.tx.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Larry J. Elmore" Subject: Re: Do we need "Mission-Critical" software? Was: What to Do? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3A4F5A4A.9ABA2C4F@chicagonet.net> <3A4F759E.A7D63F3F@netwood.net> <3A50ABDF.3A8F6C0D@acm.org> <92qdnn$jfg$1@news.huji.ac.il> <3A50C371.8B7B871@home.com> <3A51EC04.91353CE7@uol.com.br> <3A529C97.2CA4777F@home.com> <3A53CB9E.EA7CF86C@uol.com.br> <3A5466DE.811D43A5@acm.org> <932aol$ikc$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <932mi6$r2k$1@trog.dera.gov.uk> <9343b1$3g5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <934iuf$eqv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <937kc7$ssq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93c0e9$4u6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93e33l$tfu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93ekmo$a14$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93f73f$mt1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93fd9v$s03$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93fpth$697$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93hi4f$hcu$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93ikl3$i6v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <93k08f$m9v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> User-Agent: Pan/0.9.1 (Unix) X-No-Productlinks: Yes Message-ID: <%ps76.29764$ge4.11840496@news2.rdc2.tx.home.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 00:42:35 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.10.25.74 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news2.rdc2.tx.home.com 979260155 65.10.25.74 (Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:42:35 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:42:35 PST Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3932 Date: 2001-01-12T00:42:35+00:00 List-Id: In article <93k08f$m9v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, n_brunot@my-deja.com wrote: > In article <93ikl3$i6v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>, > Robert Dewar wrote: > >> Perhaps there is a language problem here, go back and reread the >> posts. > >> Sorry, that's too far from being a parsable english sentence to be >> comprehensible, perhaps you could write it in French and we would >> have a better shot at understanding what you are trying to say. > > You extremely often see language problems everywhere :-) Most of the > english spoken in the world is even worse than that and everybody > understands :-) I could make an long list of native english people who > actually wonder if you read things before answering, and see nothing > in common between short and clear questions and your more than lengthy > and unrelated answers ... :-) > > May be communication problems between you and a great part of the rest > of the world is a more appropriate explanation than language problems It appears to me that everything you just wrote actually applies to yourself rather than to Dr. Dewar. This has been an amusing thread that I've only followed out of morbid curiousity about what your next odd pronouncement will be. ;-) Larry