From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5cb36983754f64da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-28 10:47:23 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!news.glorb.com!news-spur1.glorb.com!news.alt.net!wn51feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s54.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Those "home hobbyists..." (was: No call for Ada)
References: <Dl30c.608$R37.268@read1.cgocable.net>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <%m50c.76666$Xp.353067@attbi_s54>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.161.24.134
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s54 1077994043 67.161.24.134 (Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:47:23 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:47:23 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:47:23 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5934
Date: 2004-02-28T18:47:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Efficiency in software production doesn't equate necessarily to
> quality. That is a leap of faith.
  Who said anything about quality?  The context, IIRC, was about money,
where efficiency is relevant.