From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-08 06:52:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr30.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Pat Rogers" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110022002.7ccde025@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0110060639.31567261@posting.google.com> <9pr6e8$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu> Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: <%biw7.8780$H81.3054034106@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.176.121 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com 1002549115 ST000 208.191.176.121 (Mon, 08 Oct 2001 09:51:55 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 09:51:55 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: OP]QRACE[BWMQ_H]]ZN@_TDAYZOZ@GXOXZ\@LWQHBATBTSUBYFWEAE[YJLYPIWKHTFCMZKVMB^[Z^DOBRVVMOSPFHNSYXVDIE@X\BUC@GTSX@DL^GKFFHQCCE\G[JJBMYDYIJCZM@AY]GNGPJD]YNNW\GSX^GSCKHA[]@CCB\[@LATPD\L@J\\PF]VR[QPJN Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:51:55 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13922 Date: 2001-10-08T13:51:55+00:00 List-Id: "David Starner" wrote in message news:9pr6e8$aai1@news.cis.okstate.edu... > On Sun, 07 Oct 2001 22:30:38 GMT, Pat Rogers wrote: > > I wonder if you have any idea how badly you come across on this newsgroup. > > When given a choice, people do business with people they like -- not those > > who generally spew bile. The fact that I recognize your name is not a > > positive thing here. > > You must have a thin skin, then. The post you reply to may have been a > little hot, but it wasn't exactly spewing bile. It sounded fairly > well-reasoned and argued, and didn't contain ad homine attacks or any > other signs of a flame. No, it wasn't the worst of his by any means, and there are other people who post much worse at any given moment, but he's usually very sarcastic and caustic. Big chip on his shoulder for some reason.