From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,af147e83a3a803fd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-12-20 19:40:45 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!router1.news.adelphia.net!cyclone.news.idirect.com.MISMATCH!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.sttls1.wa.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Reply-To: "DuckE" From: "DuckE" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <91gqo0$4n9$06$1@news.t-online.com> <91jsld013o5@drn.newsguy.com> <91nvfo$v72$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <91o1qu$1hq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A41161B.2FEBF03D@worldnet.att.net> <91riac$c5$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Subject: Re: gnat ADA95 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: <%Ye06.176147$U46.5521808@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 03:40:43 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.221.63 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.sttls1.wa.home.com 977370043 24.6.221.63 (Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:40:43 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:40:43 PST Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3306 Date: 2000-12-21T03:40:43+00:00 List-Id: About those version numbers. The last public release of GNAT was version 3.13p. The new version of GCC (the GNU compiler collection) will be 3.0. Is it normal for one of the languages that is a part of GCC to have a different version? SteveD "Robert Dewar" wrote in message news:91riac$c5$1@nnrp1.deja.com... > In article <3A41161B.2FEBF03D@worldnet.att.net>, > billeug@worldnet.att.net wrote: > > > and I believe they're just waiting on ACT to feel comfortable > > that GNAT works > > with gcc 3.0 and add it to the CVS tree. > > That's exactly right, and we are down to one page of > regressions against our giant test suite for GCC 2.97 now (and > there are probably only a handful of problems left). It looks > like we can perfectly syncrhonize the new GCC tree with the > 3.14 release. > > Robert Dewar > FSF Maintainer for GNAT (Gnu Ada 95) > > > Sent via Deja.com > http://www.deja.com/