From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-07 22:27:24 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!xmission!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator2-maxim!news-in.superfeed.net!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!news.xtra.co.nz!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "AG" <ang@xtra.co.nz>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <mailman.8.1054540581.12990.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnbdm1i7.1k5.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bbf9kl$7kt$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>
 <20619edc.0306021018.6ee4dd09@posting.google.com> <c5jhbb.0sd.ln@skymaster>
 <1054649187.11497@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <20619edc.0306031034.6a2f5f25@posting.google.com>
 <1054666439.685312@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnbdrj6f.i5.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <1054735867.264510@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnbds55h.edh.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>Organization: LJK
 Software <HDynJhuPyL+5@eisner.encompasserve.org>
Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <%OzEa.15868$JA5.306341@news.xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 17:28:09 +1200
NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.88.62.202
X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz
X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 1055050043 219.88.62.202 (Sun,
 08 Jun 2003 17:27:23 NZST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 17:27:23 NZST
Organization: Xtra
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38818
Date: 2003-06-08T17:28:09+12:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote in message
news:HDynJhuPyL+5@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> > Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> >
> >> If I'm not mistaken, the following code *does* compile.
> >>
> >>      for index in my_array'range loop
> >>          declare
> >>              Index : integer := 27;
> >>          begin
> >>              if my_array ( Index ) > current_maximum
> >>              then
> >>                  current_maximum := my_array ( index );
> >>                  Index := index;
> >>              end if;
> >>          end;
> >>      end loop;

It also compiles fine if you replace "Index" with "index" - try it.
Which proves the point actually - they *are* the same.
Thanks for a good example :-)