From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,43bab14b56c5ac49 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-20 11:30:05 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone-sjo1.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!cyclone-pass-sjo.usenetserver.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.sttls1.wa.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Reply-To: "DuckE" From: "DuckE" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <979748441.912448@edh3> <945o97$7l3$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Subject: Re: GNAT: warning: source alignment.... X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: <%Gla6.290393$U46.9219457@news1.sttls1.wa.home.com> Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 19:30:03 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.221.63 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.sttls1.wa.home.com 980019003 24.6.221.63 (Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:30:03 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:30:03 PST Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4242 Date: 2001-01-20T19:30:03+00:00 List-Id: > > These warnings are definitely appropriate for the given code. > We have found this particular warning VERY helpful in porting > legacy code. > Excuse me Robert, but just which of the questions from the original post did you answer? Please choose one: A) Does it make any sense to use a representation clause on a discrete generic type as above? B) Why should the source alignment be an issue here? C) I can only find alignment references to target objects - which part of the RM is this discussed? D) What can I do to remove these warnings? As a regular contributor to comp.lang.ada you often contribute meaninful information to this newsgroup. In this instance however, you did not. SteveD > > Sent via Deja.com > http://www.deja.com/